This week, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle finally made their decision: Harry will attend his father's coronation on May 6, while Meghan will remain in California with her two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. [Charles is] sad that Meghan will not be attending," a source told Us Weekly. 'Prince Charles had hoped the coronation would be an opportunity for the two of them to strengthen their bond and keep healing.' King Charles is saddened that Meghan will not be able to attend, but thrilled that Harry will be there."

According to sources speaking to The Daily Mail, Prince Charles is "disappointed" that Meghan will not be attending the ceremony at Westminster Abbey in London. According to the magazine, royal experts have described the decision as an "ideal compromise" and a possible olive branch. One source said that Harry's desire to attend the coronation seems "genuine" and that "it is important for Harry, the king's son, to show up for his father," while a second source added, "It is about showing up, showing support and being there for his father."

Royal expert Robert Jobson said Harry made the right decision, adding, "It is good news that Harry accepted the invitation and will be there to support his father. It is the most practical thing to do in a difficult situation and Harry made the right decision. He will deeply regret not attending the biggest day of his father's life. However, the fact that his wife will not attend means that it is highly unlikely that we will ever again see her at an official or palace function.

This will be the first time Harry will interact with his family since the release of Spare, a revealing book that takes aim at the institution of the monarchy and individual members of the royal family.

BBC royal correspondent Nicholas Witchell said that "there was a strong sense of betrayal within the family towards Harry. But at this moment, perhaps a moment of reconciliation, he will go to see his father crowned."